<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Will Drive Enterprise 2.0 Adoption?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/01/08/what-will-drive-adoption-of-enterprise-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/01/08/what-will-drive-adoption-of-enterprise-20/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:28:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Dearing</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/01/08/what-will-drive-adoption-of-enterprise-20/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>George Dearing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/01/08/what-will-drive-adoption-of-enterprise-20/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim -
Just clarifying, I wasn&#039;t imnplying widgets were going to be a savior. I do however think widgets represent newer approaches to application development with the main characteristics being service-orientation, flexible configuration, and self-publishing.If those things save me (or anyone else) the hassle of going through IT to get content published or growing old waiting for traditioonal application development cycles then, on second thought, maybe widgets are the savior.

Thanks for the input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim -<br />
Just clarifying, I wasn&#8217;t imnplying widgets were going to be a savior. I do however think widgets represent newer approaches to application development with the main characteristics being service-orientation, flexible configuration, and self-publishing.If those things save me (or anyone else) the hassle of going through IT to get content published or growing old waiting for traditioonal application development cycles then, on second thought, maybe widgets are the savior.</p>
<p>Thanks for the input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/01/08/what-will-drive-adoption-of-enterprise-20/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/01/08/what-will-drive-adoption-of-enterprise-20/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Huh, widgets are going to be the savior of it all.  User epiphany?  Not even close.  Typical Web 2.0 hype.  Flickr, youtube, maps, big whoop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, widgets are going to be the savior of it all.  User epiphany?  Not even close.  Typical Web 2.0 hype.  Flickr, youtube, maps, big whoop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

