inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

What are the trigger points?

by James Robertson

Traditional information systems only succeed if staff actually make use of them when looking for information. Enterprise 2.0 solutions push this one step further: to succeed, staff must also actively contribute.

Now I’ve heard this in many organisations:

Me: how often to staff use the intranet?

Them: all the time!

Me: how do you know this?

Them: well, there’s no other source for [insert key info here]

The problem is, this is simply not the case. Intranets (etc), compete with every other possible source of information. This includes emails, pieces of paper stuck to the cubicle wall, ringing someone, talking to the person next to you. If the intranet is to be really successful, it needs to be quicker and easier than any of these other methods. (Sometimes this will be the case, other times not.)

There also needs to be a point in the day when the staff member says: “I know, I’m going to look this up on the intranet”. This is what I call a trigger point, a condition or circumstance when there is a trigger or reason to actively use the systems provided.

If there isn’t a trigger point, then the intranet will never even be opened. Staff will instead just use the paper and people around them.

This is exactly the same for enterprise 2.0, only harder. Not only does there need to be trigger points for looking up information, but there needs to be trigger points for contributing and participating.

That is to say: what will staff say: “I’m going to add the link to the collaborative bookmarking system”. This is not just an issue of motivation, it’s a simpler issue of what will make sure that staff even remember to use our systems?

This is not an easy issue to overcome. What I do know, though, is that the more we integrate our enterprise 2.0 systems directly into the daily work of staff, the more likely we’ll have the trigger points we need.

Just some food for thought…

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google


1 Comment »

  Paula Thornton wrote @ January 22nd, 2007 at 3:12 pm

It’s an issue both of ‘integration’ and ‘draw’. The activities must be integrated with relevant, daily work. When you hit an intranet to launch out to another application the interface has changed. Most ‘purchased’ interfaces are deplorable, and are not optimized for specific work.

Even in the case of existing corporate ‘applications’ (I use the term lightly) the potential I saw with my last account was to re-face existing applications and cull out functions based on use. For example, the client had a Lotus Notes based application as a corporate directory. While you could find some very valuable information and/or ways to slice and dice the data, the reality is that for the majority of instances (no hard data available), people needed either a phone number or a location (and/or other information conveniently found in a person’s profile). With a goal to get indivduals as quickly as possible to existing profiles (no changes to the stuff behind the scenes) a 2.0′ish PeopleFinder was created. Blank box with a search logo (similar to upper right sample here http://www.cssbeauty.com/). Borrowing the Yahoo! Autocomplete design pattern code, just by typing the persons’s first or last name, a list of valid options appear for selection and the profile is directly accessed. No switching buttons in the interface to specify the entry as first name or last name, or department, etc.

The true value of 2.0 is in simplifying functions via the interface.

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>