<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are blogs and wikis really it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:28:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ives</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>In addition to tagging and social networking, mashups or composite applications may become the most used and useful applicaion in Enterprise 2.0 as they allow for quicxk to build combinations of data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to tagging and social networking, mashups or composite applications may become the most used and useful applicaion in Enterprise 2.0 as they allow for quicxk to build combinations of data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 07:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Ray Lane described it succintly: The Inter-Personal Enterprise. Additionally, it&#039;s about all things &quot;simple&quot; and &quot;relevant&quot;. It&#039;s understanding the needs of the employees. People Lookup is a simple box that returns a profile on an employee or a collection of them if you enter an attribute or term that matches their profile. It&#039;s about finding the highest used activities (including various corporate applications) and &#039;chunking&#039; them in the same way that chunks of a document might be relevant to a search...raising the highest-valued activity to a &#039;snippet&#039; on a desktop collection, drilling through to more interface, if needed.

Simple, relevant...design</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray Lane described it succintly: The Inter-Personal Enterprise. Additionally, it&#8217;s about all things &#8220;simple&#8221; and &#8220;relevant&#8221;. It&#8217;s understanding the needs of the employees. People Lookup is a simple box that returns a profile on an employee or a collection of them if you enter an attribute or term that matches their profile. It&#8217;s about finding the highest used activities (including various corporate applications) and &#8216;chunking&#8217; them in the same way that chunks of a document might be relevant to a search&#8230;raising the highest-valued activity to a &#8217;snippet&#8217; on a desktop collection, drilling through to more interface, if needed.</p>
<p>Simple, relevant&#8230;design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Hammock</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Hammock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve spent the past ten years immersed in trying to understand how knowledge is recorded and share, on both sides of the firewall. I&#039;ve been involved with millions of dollars worth of KM development projects -- and had some very expensive lessons from failures. Blogs and wikis (and especially blogs) are &quot;it&quot; because of their bottom-up, push-button publishing approach. While wiki software (at least mediawiki) is not yet at the push-button point yet, it still invites bottom-up experimentation -- both outside and inside the enterprise. Bundled together with tagging, simple &quot;social&quot; tools like what is taking place with MyBlogLog.com and the integration of bookmark and link and note-sharing in other forms, and the &quot;it&quot; you are referring to will appear.  Blogs and wikis may not be &quot;it,&quot; but they will be a significant part of the DNA in whatever &quot;it&quot; becomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spent the past ten years immersed in trying to understand how knowledge is recorded and share, on both sides of the firewall. I&#8217;ve been involved with millions of dollars worth of KM development projects &#8212; and had some very expensive lessons from failures. Blogs and wikis (and especially blogs) are &#8220;it&#8221; because of their bottom-up, push-button publishing approach. While wiki software (at least mediawiki) is not yet at the push-button point yet, it still invites bottom-up experimentation &#8212; both outside and inside the enterprise. Bundled together with tagging, simple &#8220;social&#8221; tools like what is taking place with MyBlogLog.com and the integration of bookmark and link and note-sharing in other forms, and the &#8220;it&#8221; you are referring to will appear.  Blogs and wikis may not be &#8220;it,&#8221; but they will be a significant part of the DNA in whatever &#8220;it&#8221; becomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghan</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>I think you might be interested in IDC&#039;s recent executive brief, &quot;Getting Results by Empowering the Information Worker: What Web 2.0 Offers Beyond Blogs and Wikis.&quot;

You can download it here: http://www.myworklight.com/contactUs.aspx?catid=62&amp;Category_Parent=28</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you might be interested in IDC&#8217;s recent executive brief, &#8220;Getting Results by Empowering the Information Worker: What Web 2.0 Offers Beyond Blogs and Wikis.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can download it here: <a href="http://www.myworklight.com/contactUs.aspx?catid=62&amp;Category_Parent=28" rel="nofollow">http://www.myworklight.com/contactUs.aspx?catid=62&amp;Category_Parent=28</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mandel</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t even say that wikis have been &quot;tremendously successful&quot; on the web, though blogs surely have been. Indeed, wikis - one of the oldest web technologies - have had the slowest adoption curve of any web-based tool, I believe.

I would think that the technologies central to Enterprise 2.0 must be those with an &#039;enterprise&#039; impact. Not an impact only on the work of a single person, or a group of people, but on the affordances of *all* enterprise work, and indeed of the enterprise IT stack as a whole.

Neither wikis nor blogs fit this description.

At this point, there is no valid reason why a vendor would make an &#039;enterprise&#039; choice of a wiki platform. There is no benefit to the enterprise via content management or handshake w/ the current IT stack to drive such a decision. Any set of users in the enterprise can use pretty much any tool, it seems to me. If I&#039;m missing something, I would love to know what it is.

One could make a better argument for adopting an enterprise-wide blogging platform, as blogs fit together like lego pieces, and underlying engines for tagging and so forth are nice at the platform level.

Nonetheless, neither blogs nor wikis can carry any load for any content outside their realms; they are not really the platform for Enterprise 2.0.

What is? Tagging, social bookmarking and social networking, that&#039;s what. Now, full disclosure; I&#039;m involved in a startup offering just this platform: www.connectbeam.com. So take my words with whatever quantity of salt seems appropriate to you. Yet, think about it -- don&#039;t these functions better provide a platform from which wikis and blogs might emerge than the reverse?

I believe we will see wide adoption of these paradigms (and the services of Connectbeam, I hope) within the next 24 months.

(This is so long I&#039;m going to cross-post it at www.tommandel.com/blog/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t even say that wikis have been &#8220;tremendously successful&#8221; on the web, though blogs surely have been. Indeed, wikis &#8211; one of the oldest web technologies &#8211; have had the slowest adoption curve of any web-based tool, I believe.</p>
<p>I would think that the technologies central to Enterprise 2.0 must be those with an &#8216;enterprise&#8217; impact. Not an impact only on the work of a single person, or a group of people, but on the affordances of *all* enterprise work, and indeed of the enterprise IT stack as a whole.</p>
<p>Neither wikis nor blogs fit this description.</p>
<p>At this point, there is no valid reason why a vendor would make an &#8216;enterprise&#8217; choice of a wiki platform. There is no benefit to the enterprise via content management or handshake w/ the current IT stack to drive such a decision. Any set of users in the enterprise can use pretty much any tool, it seems to me. If I&#8217;m missing something, I would love to know what it is.</p>
<p>One could make a better argument for adopting an enterprise-wide blogging platform, as blogs fit together like lego pieces, and underlying engines for tagging and so forth are nice at the platform level.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, neither blogs nor wikis can carry any load for any content outside their realms; they are not really the platform for Enterprise 2.0.</p>
<p>What is? Tagging, social bookmarking and social networking, that&#8217;s what. Now, full disclosure; I&#8217;m involved in a startup offering just this platform: <a href="http://www.connectbeam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.connectbeam.com</a>. So take my words with whatever quantity of salt seems appropriate to you. Yet, think about it &#8212; don&#8217;t these functions better provide a platform from which wikis and blogs might emerge than the reverse?</p>
<p>I believe we will see wide adoption of these paradigms (and the services of Connectbeam, I hope) within the next 24 months.</p>
<p>(This is so long I&#8217;m going to cross-post it at <a href="http://www.tommandel.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tommandel.com/blog/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/are-blogs-and-wikis-really-it/#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>And let&#039;s not limit it to software. It&#039;s all about the impact on and implications for the workplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let&#8217;s not limit it to software. It&#8217;s all about the impact on and implications for the workplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

