<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with Jim McGee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/interview-with-jim-mcgee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/interview-with-jim-mcgee/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:28:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/interview-with-jim-mcgee/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/09/interview-with-jim-mcgee/#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Iterative innovation and thinking...how brilliant...it&#039;s called Design Thinking...that&#039;s why it&#039;s the &#039;next big thing&#039; that BusinessWeek beat Forrester to (general collection of references http://del.icio.us/iknovate/DesignThinking)

The part that bothers me...is that when I put this wrapper around technology and present it to marketers, they&#039;re all over it. When you present it to most technologists...they think it&#039;s marketing and stop listening. The wrapper makes the technology so foreign to them they look at you with blank stares and say, &quot;I have no idea what you&#039;re talking about.&quot; THAT&#039;S the problem...it&#039;s exactly the theme of Ray Lane&#039;s message.

I worry about the IT&#039;ers (who in my book aren&#039;tn really good technologists if they&#039;re not seeing this), who are going to suddenly realize in the next few years that because they don&#039;t really understand what it takes to really &#039;inform&#039; anyone of anything (they just work in the &#039;T&#039; department), that IT will dissolve into the model &#039;T&#039; they&#039;ve been working under (ala. technical operations) and the real &#039;thinking&#039; will be moved into the hands of the employees, and they&#039;ll simply directly seek outsourced coding support, because outsourced resources will work harder for them, and they&#039;ll listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iterative innovation and thinking&#8230;how brilliant&#8230;it&#8217;s called Design Thinking&#8230;that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s the &#8216;next big thing&#8217; that BusinessWeek beat Forrester to (general collection of references <a href="http://del.icio.us/iknovate/DesignThinking)" rel="nofollow">http://del.icio.us/iknovate/DesignThinking)</a></p>
<p>The part that bothers me&#8230;is that when I put this wrapper around technology and present it to marketers, they&#8217;re all over it. When you present it to most technologists&#8230;they think it&#8217;s marketing and stop listening. The wrapper makes the technology so foreign to them they look at you with blank stares and say, &#8220;I have no idea what you&#8217;re talking about.&#8221; THAT&#8217;S the problem&#8230;it&#8217;s exactly the theme of Ray Lane&#8217;s message.</p>
<p>I worry about the IT&#8217;ers (who in my book aren&#8217;tn really good technologists if they&#8217;re not seeing this), who are going to suddenly realize in the next few years that because they don&#8217;t really understand what it takes to really &#8216;inform&#8217; anyone of anything (they just work in the &#8216;T&#8217; department), that IT will dissolve into the model &#8216;T&#8217; they&#8217;ve been working under (ala. technical operations) and the real &#8216;thinking&#8217; will be moved into the hands of the employees, and they&#8217;ll simply directly seek outsourced coding support, because outsourced resources will work harder for them, and they&#8217;ll listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

