inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

An IT Manager’s Lament: Enterprise 2.0 a Tough Sell

by Joe McKendrick

The technology consumer market may shift direction on a moment’s notice as new ideas are brought to market, but for enterprises, it’s slower slog to move to new technologies. Pilots need to be conducted, concepts vetted before review boards, ROI estimated, and various constituencies convinced of its value.

One global Internet manager recently blogged about how fired up he was about the new Enterprise 2.0 approaches coming to the forefront. He was skeptical about all the Web 2.0 claims until recently, until the market began to take off.

However, he expects to encounter a lot of resistance, especially from the IT department.

“Large companies are not famous for rapid adoption of new tools. Most of companies are using SAP, Microsoft or IBM. IT managers don’t take the risk to connect applications that could be incompatible.”

Plus, even though the software vendors are starting to offer some Web 2.0-related software, there will be the usual issues with integrating the solutions with the 1.0 versions of software. Best case scenario — enterprises will start to see enterprise 2.0 features at work by 2009.

The bottom line is that to advance in the enterprise, Enterprise 2.0 will needs enthusiastic proponents that can work both within the system and work outside the system when necessary. Ultimately, Enterprise 2.0 is a bottom-up movement that will be driven by empowered end-users — just as PCs worked their way into the enterprise two decades ago.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google


3 Comments »

  Oscar Berg wrote @ February 16th, 2007 at 5:02 am

Rapid adoption of technologies and tools usually means that you adopt it without really knowing exactly what to use it for and how. Hence, many companies who have had bad experiences from early adoption choose to wait with adopting new technologies until they see how they develop. What is dangerous is if the companies do not start thinking about how new technologies and tools might affect their environment and their business, and if and how they could use them to get a competitive advantage. I see no real problem in waiting, as long as you keep yourself updated about new technlogies and start thinking if and how they can benefit or damage your business.

  Sebastien Pages wrote @ February 19th, 2007 at 5:54 am

Thanks for your post Joe.
The aim of my post was to highlight the big gap between the buzz word 2.0, the tools we have at home and the diffciculties we are facing to meet business needs and enterprise users expectations - they often do no understand the reason why they don’t have in their ouwn company similar technology they have at home.
cheers

  Christine Bentsen wrote @ February 20th, 2007 at 10:55 am

I’ve been trying with not much success to get my employer (large technology firm) to really capitalize on Web 2.0 possiblities, with well… limited success. We got blogs introduced about 18 months ago, but it’s just the execs who are blogging and they hold to the sanitized party line. And… they’ve been known to delete negative or challenging comments. IMHO, there’s a first mover advantage to be had for the large companies that embrace web 2.0 - but they really need to do it, not just embrace some of the tech and none of the spirit. Web 2.0 is a difficult concept for companies that are used to controlling their environment, and I agree, it’s going to be a hard road. I’d say it’s more culture than IT issues.

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>