<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solving the 1:10:100% problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/23/solving-the-110100-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/23/solving-the-110100-problem/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:28:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/23/solving-the-110100-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/23/solving-the-110100-problem/#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>I agree that any Enterprise 2.0 project haphazardly deployed will result in only a 1% minority who actually publish original content. These are the &quot;Alpha&quot; bloggers who &quot;have something to say&quot; or are driven by their own reputation. But if you wrap a process around the use of the Enterprise 2.0 technology, then I can guarantee 100% participation in the relevant groups. These are the &quot;Beta&quot; bloggers. Read &lt;a href=&quot;http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Public1022&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this story about ShoreBank&#039;s IT group&lt;/a&gt; for 1 real live example and my blog post &lt;a href=&quot;http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Blog272&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Beta Bloggers Need Not Lurk in the Enterprise.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that any Enterprise 2.0 project haphazardly deployed will result in only a 1% minority who actually publish original content. These are the &#8220;Alpha&#8221; bloggers who &#8220;have something to say&#8221; or are driven by their own reputation. But if you wrap a process around the use of the Enterprise 2.0 technology, then I can guarantee 100% participation in the relevant groups. These are the &#8220;Beta&#8221; bloggers. Read <a href="http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Public1022" rel="nofollow">this story about ShoreBank&#8217;s IT group</a> for 1 real live example and my blog post <a href="http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Blog272" rel="nofollow">Beta Bloggers Need Not Lurk in the Enterprise.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoav</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/23/solving-the-110100-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/02/23/solving-the-110100-problem/#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>The fact that a model in which only 1% of production is a success doesn&#039;t fit with corporate thinking, sounds like a big problem. I beleive that a bigger problem is that those 1% (creators/thinkers) have no incentive to share their knowledge in the current corporate culture. On the internet those thinkers (if they are good onez) are well rewarded. IMO that is why behind-the-firewall blogging fails so miserably while on the internet blogging is booming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that a model in which only 1% of production is a success doesn&#8217;t fit with corporate thinking, sounds like a big problem. I beleive that a bigger problem is that those 1% (creators/thinkers) have no incentive to share their knowledge in the current corporate culture. On the internet those thinkers (if they are good onez) are well rewarded. IMO that is why behind-the-firewall blogging fails so miserably while on the internet blogging is booming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

