inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

BEA takes the Web 2.0 plunge, in the deep end

by Dana Gardner

After a lengthy gestation period, BEA Systems recently delivered three enterprise Web 2.0 applications at  the O’Reilly Emerging Technology Conference  (ETech) in San Diego. The new products aim at enabling deep end-user participation, while at the same time giving IT the management and governance control essential to enterprise systems.

BEA has been talking about the products for over a year under various code names, as the company prepared to dive into the turbulent waters of social computing. The new offerings, part of the AquaLogic suite, include AquaLogic Ensemble (formerly Project Runner), Aqua-Logic Pages (formerly Project Builder), and AquaLogic Pathways (formerly Project Graffiti).

Ensemble provides authentication and access control, while allowing users to create reusable widgets from new or existing code. The users can then develop mashups, while Ensemble tracks what users do within applications. The mashups can be independent of platform and hosting environment.

Pages allows non-IT users to tap into enterprise data and create Web pages, blogs, and Wikis from a palette of drag-and-drop components, while the system tracks changes, versioning, and access. Users write to or edit pages as they would a word-processing document or an email.

Pathways, a collaborative information discovery tool, combines tagging, bookmarking, and analytics to provide more relevant search results. Users can  develop their own customizable tags or rely on tags from others, while bookmarks maintain lists of favorite or important documents. Pathways also allows used to extract metadata from a variety of sources to create a global set of properties.

BEA has also established a resource site for enterprise collaboration, http://en.terpri.se, which is reminiscent of del.icio.us, a non-enterprise social networking and bookmarking Web service.

Based on a recent, albeit non-scientific, survey I did via my blog polling feature, a sizable portion of readers think vendors like BEA will do well by incorporating Web 2.0 features into their product lines. We’ve also seen other vendors go down the Web 2.0 path, including Cisco, Intel, and Oracle.

Indeed, I was at an IBM open source conference last week, and the topic of Web 2.0 functions and business models was a recurring theme, even if not so prominently on the agenda. The analysts seemed to take the discussion there repeatedly. More on the implications of Web 2.0 on IBM in upcoming blogs.

Share and Enjoy:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt


4 Comments »

Paula ThorntonApril 2nd, 2007 at 4:58 pm

Don’t be mislead by the slight of hand. I’ve met with AquaLogic staff. They are simply going through the motions based on a checklist. They do not truly understand anything about the 2.0 space. I base this on pointed inquiries about how they operate, how they handle feedback and whether or not they even recogize critical UI design flaws as flaws. Code red on all accounts.

Shane PearsonApril 4th, 2007 at 9:57 pm

Paula,
Please feel free to contact me directly so we can discuss Web 2.0 We do believe our new products will provide the entry point for many people who are looking to leverage Web 2.0 in their business, and we are not just going through a checklist.

Cheers,
Shane Pearson
BEA Systems, Inc.

Paula ThorntonApril 6th, 2007 at 10:25 am

You might note that I’ve stated elsewhere that 2.0 is not about technology. Technology is an enabler. An architecture which separates ‘collaboration’ as something different from every other function is not a sound 2.0 solution. An architecture which ‘fixes’ the interface and has an RSS implementation which is both inconsistent and non-standard is a red flag when evaluating a technology for 2.0 flexibility.

2.0 is all about simplicity and flexibility. AquaLogic is shackled by it’s past and BEA appears to be unprepared (as repeatedly reinforced by staffers) to pursure a divergent design strategy to update their underlying architecture while honoring their existing client base.

None of these reflect 2.0 thinking. So replace ‘checklist’ with ‘going through the motions’.

Shane PearsonApril 7th, 2007 at 1:48 pm

Paula,
I am looking forward to connecting directly to discuss some of your perceptions.

Yes, I completely agree that “technology is an enabler”. As I said above, we think we can help
people leverage Web 2.0 in their business. “Leverage” is the word I used since that is generally why people invest in technology. It is not technology for the sake of it, but it is investment in technology with the desire or hope that it will help the people, team, organization, etc. be better able to reach their desired goals.

Cheers,
Shane

» Subscribe to the RSS feed for these comments

Your comment

Want an image to appear near your comment? Go to gravatar.com

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Additional comments powered by BackType