<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tranforming enterprise work &#8212; can it transform the enterprise itself?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/05/01/282/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/05/01/282/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:29:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mandel</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/05/01/282/comment-page-1/#comment-8400</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mandel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/05/01/282/#comment-8400</guid>
		<description>Hi Paula -- yes, and i was one of those who added earlier posts referencing the controversy. But, I had something else to say about it, so I did.

Shiv -- of course, new people in the enterprise will create pressure to use the tools they know. But that&#039;s not the change Davenport was questioning. He was questioning whether the new tools will change *the enterprise itself,&quot; making it more democratic, etc.

I am commenting on what I think is something of a misunderstanding in the question itself -- and in a way you echo the misunderstanding by *assuming* that the use of new tools *is* the transformation some people are hoping for. 

These new tools change *enterprise work*; they change the ways we do our jobs, making it much easier to be productive and giving us access to people and information that can up the quality of our work. *That* is why they will be used widely. The question of whether they change organizations in any further sense is still open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paula &#8212; yes, and i was one of those who added earlier posts referencing the controversy. But, I had something else to say about it, so I did.</p>
<p>Shiv &#8212; of course, new people in the enterprise will create pressure to use the tools they know. But that&#8217;s not the change Davenport was questioning. He was questioning whether the new tools will change *the enterprise itself,&#8221; making it more democratic, etc.</p>
<p>I am commenting on what I think is something of a misunderstanding in the question itself &#8212; and in a way you echo the misunderstanding by *assuming* that the use of new tools *is* the transformation some people are hoping for. </p>
<p>These new tools change *enterprise work*; they change the ways we do our jobs, making it much easier to be productive and giving us access to people and information that can up the quality of our work. *That* is why they will be used widely. The question of whether they change organizations in any further sense is still open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiv Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/05/01/282/comment-page-1/#comment-8310</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiv Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 23:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/05/01/282/#comment-8310</guid>
		<description>I side with Andrew McAfee but maybe without the same enthusiasm that he has.I believe Enterprise 2.0 software will have a transformative influence on organizations but it will take time. We won&#039;t see the changes tomorrow, next year or even the one following that. The changes will really happen when the Facebook/MySpace generation enters the workplace in large numbers and moves upto middle management. They&#039;ll drive the change as the only way they&#039;ll care to communicate and collaborate will be with Enterprise 2.0 technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I side with Andrew McAfee but maybe without the same enthusiasm that he has.I believe Enterprise 2.0 software will have a transformative influence on organizations but it will take time. We won&#8217;t see the changes tomorrow, next year or even the one following that. The changes will really happen when the Facebook/MySpace generation enters the workplace in large numbers and moves upto middle management. They&#8217;ll drive the change as the only way they&#8217;ll care to communicate and collaborate will be with Enterprise 2.0 technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/05/01/282/comment-page-1/#comment-8290</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/05/01/282/#comment-8290</guid>
		<description>Tom: Back to March 27th, the conversation about this piece was started (subsequent posts referenced that earlier post). Perhaps you&#039;d like to add a comment or two based on the earlier conversations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: Back to March 27th, the conversation about this piece was started (subsequent posts referenced that earlier post). Perhaps you&#8217;d like to add a comment or two based on the earlier conversations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
