<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return on Investment? &#8212; What about Return on Change?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/19/return-on-investment-what-about-return-on-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/19/return-on-investment-what-about-return-on-change/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:29:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/19/return-on-investment-what-about-return-on-change/comment-page-1/#comment-21054</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/19/return-on-investment-what-about-return-on-change/#comment-21054</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. ROI is a useful tool but has many limitations and it is difficult to apply to many situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. ROI is a useful tool but has many limitations and it is difficult to apply to many situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/19/return-on-investment-what-about-return-on-change/comment-page-1/#comment-17554</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/19/return-on-investment-what-about-return-on-change/#comment-17554</guid>
		<description>As a point of reference...a recent &#039;change&#039; made by AT&amp;T that many are still oblivious to...the exodus will not even be noticed because there is decidedly no comprehensive cross-channel perspective on cause/effect:
http://totalexperience.corante.com/archives/2007/06/18/relationships_are_about_the_total_experience.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a point of reference&#8230;a recent &#8216;change&#8217; made by AT&amp;T that many are still oblivious to&#8230;the exodus will not even be noticed because there is decidedly no comprehensive cross-channel perspective on cause/effect:<br />
<a href="http://totalexperience.corante.com/archives/2007/06/18/relationships_are_about_the_total_experience.php" rel="nofollow">http://totalexperience.corante.com/archives/2007/06/18/relationships_are_about_the_total_experience.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/19/return-on-investment-what-about-return-on-change/comment-page-1/#comment-17553</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/19/return-on-investment-what-about-return-on-change/#comment-17553</guid>
		<description>Tom: I applaud the &#039;different&#039; perspective. The problem is that there are ways in which even positive &#039;return&#039; can be identified for change...e.g. it decreased costs. But these are financial measures, not economic ones. Economics cast a wider net...there are larger implications. The change that saved money today can lose customers which don&#039;t show up in the metrics as &#039;significant&#039; for 6 months.

That&#039;s why the measures must be small, pervasive and constant. It&#039;s not about measuring &#039;a&#039; potential outcome...it&#039;s about measuring &#039;the&#039; outcome constantly...and by &#039;testing&#039; the changes before rolling them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: I applaud the &#8216;different&#8217; perspective. The problem is that there are ways in which even positive &#8216;return&#8217; can be identified for change&#8230;e.g. it decreased costs. But these are financial measures, not economic ones. Economics cast a wider net&#8230;there are larger implications. The change that saved money today can lose customers which don&#8217;t show up in the metrics as &#8217;significant&#8217; for 6 months.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why the measures must be small, pervasive and constant. It&#8217;s not about measuring &#8216;a&#8217; potential outcome&#8230;it&#8217;s about measuring &#8216;the&#8217; outcome constantly&#8230;and by &#8216;testing&#8217; the changes before rolling them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
