<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 Conference Recap &#8211; What did you miss?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/23/enterprise-20-conference-recap-what-did-you-miss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/23/enterprise-20-conference-recap-what-did-you-miss/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:38:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: assaf</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/23/enterprise-20-conference-recap-what-did-you-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-18555</link>
		<dc:creator>assaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/23/enterprise-20-conference-recap-what-did-you-miss/#comment-18555</guid>
		<description>Real Enterprise 2.0 Value, impressions from enterprise 2.0 launchpad event 

i tend to disagree with you on the launchpad event (need to admit that i work for one of the launchpad companies www.clarizen.com) , and here are my thoughts ... 

After being in enterprise 2.0 show , I am left with the feeling that just like any new trend , many vendors  talk about bringing collaboration to the enterprise , many companies want to be in the space , but there is still a lot of confusion ...   

The majority of enterprise customers coming to the show , know that they want or need to go o Enterprise 2.0 , but still don&#039;t understand how to do that , they try to find he real business value of the offerings being brought to the table , and this is where the solutions presented differ 

Many of the solutions are for data  sharing, data gathering, blogging and mash-ups, but still all of those solutions, as great as they appear in the home market, are still not packaged and positioned in a way that a real company can benefit from the real values that they can provide. 

Many of the enterprises , have already working processes and organizations , they cannot , and will not change the structure or the basic procedures in order to get to the new age , what they are looking for is how to unleash the collaboration power of the web 2.0/enterprise 2.0 in order to enhance the performance and utilization of their  current structure. 

A real enterprise 2.0 solution should incorporate fit into the company&#039;s process and enhance it , and this is where Clarizen is getting into the picture. 

One of the basic processes any company has is the project management process, where the majority of the company&#039;s IP and knowhow is centralized. This is the right place to incorporate the web 2.0 capabilities. As they are coordinated with an existing Structure and process, but enhance the collaboration, the knowledge sharing and at the end, increase the probability of a project to be successful. 

Enterprise 2.0 is the future, but it needs to grow to solutions like the solution Clarizen offers, in order to fit into corporate America&#039;s need to get into the web 2.0 in a productive way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real Enterprise 2.0 Value, impressions from enterprise 2.0 launchpad event </p>
<p>i tend to disagree with you on the launchpad event (need to admit that i work for one of the launchpad companies <a href="http://www.clarizen.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.clarizen.com</a>) , and here are my thoughts &#8230; </p>
<p>After being in enterprise 2.0 show , I am left with the feeling that just like any new trend , many vendors  talk about bringing collaboration to the enterprise , many companies want to be in the space , but there is still a lot of confusion &#8230;   </p>
<p>The majority of enterprise customers coming to the show , know that they want or need to go o Enterprise 2.0 , but still don&#8217;t understand how to do that , they try to find he real business value of the offerings being brought to the table , and this is where the solutions presented differ </p>
<p>Many of the solutions are for data  sharing, data gathering, blogging and mash-ups, but still all of those solutions, as great as they appear in the home market, are still not packaged and positioned in a way that a real company can benefit from the real values that they can provide. </p>
<p>Many of the enterprises , have already working processes and organizations , they cannot , and will not change the structure or the basic procedures in order to get to the new age , what they are looking for is how to unleash the collaboration power of the web 2.0/enterprise 2.0 in order to enhance the performance and utilization of their  current structure. </p>
<p>A real enterprise 2.0 solution should incorporate fit into the company&#8217;s process and enhance it , and this is where Clarizen is getting into the picture. </p>
<p>One of the basic processes any company has is the project management process, where the majority of the company&#8217;s IP and knowhow is centralized. This is the right place to incorporate the web 2.0 capabilities. As they are coordinated with an existing Structure and process, but enhance the collaboration, the knowledge sharing and at the end, increase the probability of a project to be successful. </p>
<p>Enterprise 2.0 is the future, but it needs to grow to solutions like the solution Clarizen offers, in order to fit into corporate America&#8217;s need to get into the web 2.0 in a productive way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/23/enterprise-20-conference-recap-what-did-you-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-18488</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/23/enterprise-20-conference-recap-what-did-you-miss/#comment-18488</guid>
		<description>Jevon:

1. I really think that it&#039;s important for us to understand the &#039;failure&#039; of the Launch Pad Session: what did the vendors focus on that made them &#039;think&#039; they had met the criteria; what were they missing? This is cricital information to help accellerate adoption (ala. understanding).

2. While I wasn&#039;t at the conference your comments made me grateful for the FASTforward07 conference as my experiences there were just as you described them (kudos to FAST for that).

3. I disagree with Andrew for exactly your last point (he comes by it honestly, if you read the comments he posted about what he used to believe...he hasn&#039;t yet thrown off all of those beliefs). Andrew said, &quot;Enterprise 2.0 is not going to radically change organizations in the 5 years.&quot; That&#039;s an accurate projection based on &#039;old&#039; thinking. No one can stop it. Why? For all the reasons that it&#039;s 2.0. Emergent behaviors cause exponential change. Emergent behaviors are critical mass...this isn&#039;t change that is managed into a new tomorrow. This is change that happens organically. When your body responds to a virus organically, the results can be sudden and violent -- all of your systems respond and respond quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jevon:</p>
<p>1. I really think that it&#8217;s important for us to understand the &#8216;failure&#8217; of the Launch Pad Session: what did the vendors focus on that made them &#8216;think&#8217; they had met the criteria; what were they missing? This is cricital information to help accellerate adoption (ala. understanding).</p>
<p>2. While I wasn&#8217;t at the conference your comments made me grateful for the FASTforward07 conference as my experiences there were just as you described them (kudos to FAST for that).</p>
<p>3. I disagree with Andrew for exactly your last point (he comes by it honestly, if you read the comments he posted about what he used to believe&#8230;he hasn&#8217;t yet thrown off all of those beliefs). Andrew said, &#8220;Enterprise 2.0 is not going to radically change organizations in the 5 years.&#8221; That&#8217;s an accurate projection based on &#8216;old&#8217; thinking. No one can stop it. Why? For all the reasons that it&#8217;s 2.0. Emergent behaviors cause exponential change. Emergent behaviors are critical mass&#8230;this isn&#8217;t change that is managed into a new tomorrow. This is change that happens organically. When your body responds to a virus organically, the results can be sudden and violent &#8212; all of your systems respond and respond quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Paterson</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/23/enterprise-20-conference-recap-what-did-you-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-18308</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Paterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/06/23/enterprise-20-conference-recap-what-did-you-miss/#comment-18308</guid>
		<description>I agree - on the customer front - Mine are really on the edge - the issue that they struggle with constantly is their own ability to engage - it&#039;s a human thing - the tools are largely irrelevant in that while without blogs,(Wordpress gets a lot of marks) facebook Youtube etc they could not do this - the challenge is to find ways of using the tool to connect on a more human level. It is not much about features - though:
* ease of use rates high
* already has a big community is very important</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; on the customer front &#8211; Mine are really on the edge &#8211; the issue that they struggle with constantly is their own ability to engage &#8211; it&#8217;s a human thing &#8211; the tools are largely irrelevant in that while without blogs,(Wordpress gets a lot of marks) facebook Youtube etc they could not do this &#8211; the challenge is to find ways of using the tool to connect on a more human level. It is not much about features &#8211; though:<br />
* ease of use rates high<br />
* already has a big community is very important</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
