inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Google Makes More Moves in the Enterprise Market

by Bill Ives

The New York Times technology blog, BITS, had a post, Google Goes Corporate, which talked about their recent acquisition of Postini, which “offers a service to help companies protect and control their e-mail , for $625 million in cash.” Now the title is a bit misleading as Google has been trying to go corporate for a number of years. I am sure that they will succeed on some level and making the right acquisitions will be key.

While I use Google all the time and would be lost without it, there are many limitations to the core search tool that may have greater impact in the enterprise than out on the web. Personal intent is one. For example, I did a post on “Groove on Location in Albania” in 2004 about the interesting work a friend was doing with Groove software in Albania. When I typed in - location Albania - in Google in 2004 I got 836,000 hits. My post was on the first page with many Albanian dating services, a listing of air conditioning contractors, and how to get phone cards. Now in 2007, my post is still number 8 but its companions are quite different but they still represent a variety of intentions.

Google is also optimized to look at the unstructured data found on the web but inside the enterprise there is also much structured data. There are many options to the reliance on text-matching links to unstructured data that Google offers. For example, EasyAsk offers the ability to put in plain language queries and have the search engine respond back with a clarifying question to narrow the search. For example, if you ask, “what is the price of a stock trade” on a financial services site Google and other text-matching tools will have many types of responses. EasyAsk might come back and ask you, “do you mean commission and fees?” which contains none of your original words.

Another feature found in other search tools is the concept of “termless” search. For example, iQuest which, like EasyAsk, can be targeted intelligently at both structured and unstructured data, also can let content speak for itself. The tool surfaces the top number of (usually 10 – but that number can be set) concepts or themes that are being discussed in a given body of text such as a blog. This reduces much manual analysis and allows you to look deeper into what people are saying in large amounts of content. It also looks at everything and is thus does not let bias creep. Most manual analysis by people will have preconceived notions that consciously or even unconsciously sift out what might seem important. The automated tool is not “smart” enough to do this which is a good thing.

These are just some of the features enterprise Google will need to work on if it is to compete on more than price and brand.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • bodytext
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt


2 Comments »

Jeremy ThomasJuly 10th, 2007 at 5:45 am

Hi Bill,

Google has come a long way with the notion of “enterprise search”. I’ve personally worked on several Google Enterprise Search implementations and have found them to be, while far from perfect, at returning search results from unstructured and structured enterprise content repositories.

Google Enterprise Search provides the ability to execute SQL statements at crawl time (structured data) and serve results from relational databases along with unstructured results when a user performs a search. It also can integrate to line of business applications using the REST protocol, and many LOBA’s have Google Enterprise Search adapters out of the box (like Cognos 8i for business intelligence).

Google is also uniquely positioned to dominate the E2.0 space with acquisitions like JotSpot (wiki), Blogger, Google Base (social bookmarking) etc., making their enterprise offering as much about collaboration as it is search. I wrote a bit about this over at my blog (shameless plug) at http://www.socialglass.com/archives/82.

Bill IvesJuly 10th, 2007 at 6:51 am

George - Thanks for your update. I am not surorised that Google continues to get better at enterprise search. Feedburner was also a significant acquisition, although perhaps more for the web. I have been a long time feedburner user from the time it was very simple and watched it get more robust. I like your post on Integrating Google Enterprise Search with Social Bookmarking. I have also written a bit about the enterprise YouTube concept you mention in your post Why Google Could Dominate Enterprise 2.0. I think this could really corproate communication.

Your comment

Want an image to appear near your comment? Go to gravatar.com

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>