<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;&#8221;By their works shall ye know them &#8211; Social Software outs the Bureaucrat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:29:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/comment-page-1/#comment-31555</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/#comment-31555</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t underestimate the power and the motivation of bureaucrats to impede change and to preserve their power. As much as I want to believe that this round of innovation might tip the balance, I have to suspect that political skill will continue to matter more than we might like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t underestimate the power and the motivation of bureaucrats to impede change and to preserve their power. As much as I want to believe that this round of innovation might tip the balance, I have to suspect that political skill will continue to matter more than we might like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/comment-page-1/#comment-27365</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/#comment-27365</guid>
		<description>Agreed. As part of a team rolling out social software to a large consultancy, this could not be more evident. Having suffered through countless bad decisions made by those in power only because of political deftness, it is high time that professional work be accomplished by professional people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. As part of a team rolling out social software to a large consultancy, this could not be more evident. Having suffered through countless bad decisions made by those in power only because of political deftness, it is high time that professional work be accomplished by professional people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/comment-page-1/#comment-27346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/#comment-27346</guid>
		<description>Rob - very well put.  From my perspective this is a fundamental reason for why I believe in Enterprise 2.0.  Imagine how much more efficient organizations will become if the self-serving are exposed for what they are leaving behind the people who truly add value.  To me this prospect is exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; very well put.  From my perspective this is a fundamental reason for why I believe in Enterprise 2.0.  Imagine how much more efficient organizations will become if the self-serving are exposed for what they are leaving behind the people who truly add value.  To me this prospect is exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/comment-page-1/#comment-27169</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/07/28/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them-social-software-outs-the-bureaucrat/#comment-27169</guid>
		<description>This is a really interesting idea, but how do you know a type of person won&#039;t emerge, who is adept at gaming the system in social software threads?

I think a lot of the promise of social software is that it illuminates what were previously cones of darkness. For example, a given professor may have a bad reputation but this is only something which students who are attentive &quot;to the grapevine find out about&quot;. However, if you post class evaluations online where students can vote on their satisfaction with a course and everyone has access to that data, you eliminate a lot of information assymetries by enlarging the circle of people in the know.
You also create new layers of accountability in the sense that it becomes more difficult for people to hide behind their aura. You can look them up and check up on what they&#039;ve contributed. 

But I sometimes worry that we spend too little time thinking about the shortcomings of such systems. People who can adopt these systems and practices can gain a lot from them, but in order to leverage their full potential you also need to understand the shortcomings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really interesting idea, but how do you know a type of person won&#8217;t emerge, who is adept at gaming the system in social software threads?</p>
<p>I think a lot of the promise of social software is that it illuminates what were previously cones of darkness. For example, a given professor may have a bad reputation but this is only something which students who are attentive &#8220;to the grapevine find out about&#8221;. However, if you post class evaluations online where students can vote on their satisfaction with a course and everyone has access to that data, you eliminate a lot of information assymetries by enlarging the circle of people in the know.<br />
You also create new layers of accountability in the sense that it becomes more difficult for people to hide behind their aura. You can look them up and check up on what they&#8217;ve contributed. </p>
<p>But I sometimes worry that we spend too little time thinking about the shortcomings of such systems. People who can adopt these systems and practices can gain a lot from them, but in order to leverage their full potential you also need to understand the shortcomings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
