<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on knowledge management as learning support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/08/15/more-on-knowledge-management-as-learning-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/08/15/more-on-knowledge-management-as-learning-support/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:38:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/08/15/more-on-knowledge-management-as-learning-support/comment-page-1/#comment-33955</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardblog.com/2007/08/15/more-on-knowledge-management-as-learning-support/#comment-33955</guid>
		<description>As we continue to try and pronounce quite loudly that 2.0 is not about technology, if there were but one message that we could get across as to what differentiates 2.0 it should be simply: simple.

Somehow I could have sworn that this was a message I&#039;d been keeping a focus on in my own writings, but looking back, clearly it was something in my head that hasn&#039;t hit the pages far often enough (or was a thought intended to be written when other words got in the way first).

Thanks for bringing focus to it again. I&#039;ll have to rectify this soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we continue to try and pronounce quite loudly that 2.0 is not about technology, if there were but one message that we could get across as to what differentiates 2.0 it should be simply: simple.</p>
<p>Somehow I could have sworn that this was a message I&#8217;d been keeping a focus on in my own writings, but looking back, clearly it was something in my head that hasn&#8217;t hit the pages far often enough (or was a thought intended to be written when other words got in the way first).</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing focus to it again. I&#8217;ll have to rectify this soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
