<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is quality in Social Media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/09/12/what-is-quality-in-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/09/12/what-is-quality-in-social-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:28:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Juhani Anttila</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/09/12/what-is-quality-in-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-59429</link>
		<dc:creator>Juhani Anttila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/09/12/what-is-quality-in-social-media/#comment-59429</guid>
		<description>It is very pity that so many – particularly so called quality professionals – have destroyed the whole beautiful idea of quality with formal requirements etc. I prefer the recognized international standard definition of ISO 9000 for the concept quality that is – if you like see it so – really open to deep understanding. ISO 9000 says something like this: “Quality of an item means the degree that that item fulfils the needs and expectations of all those parties that are interested in that item”. Further reeding:
http://qiblog.blogspot.com/2005/03/fuzzy-and-relative-concept-of-quality.html 
http://qiblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/searching-for-archetype-of-quality_24.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very pity that so many – particularly so called quality professionals – have destroyed the whole beautiful idea of quality with formal requirements etc. I prefer the recognized international standard definition of ISO 9000 for the concept quality that is – if you like see it so – really open to deep understanding. ISO 9000 says something like this: “Quality of an item means the degree that that item fulfils the needs and expectations of all those parties that are interested in that item”. Further reeding:<br />
<a href="http://qiblog.blogspot.com/2005/03/fuzzy-and-relative-concept-of-quality.html" rel="nofollow">http://qiblog.blogspot.com/2005/03/fuzzy-and-relative-concept-of-quality.html</a><br />
<a href="http://qiblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/searching-for-archetype-of-quality_24.html" rel="nofollow">http://qiblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/searching-for-archetype-of-quality_24.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

