inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

More Dead Paradigms in Organizations

by Jevon MacDonald

I wrote about Dead Paradigms earlier and wanted to bring up a few more that have come to mind.

Interval Reporting
Larger organizations typically have set reporting periods during which financial information is aggregated and compiled in to reports by the finance department.

Now, I recognize that this Paradigm passed away a long time ago, but a surprising number of organizations continue to use set reporting periods.

As business intelligence tools allow organizations to become more in tune with moment-to-moment performance, trends can be identified on a far smaller scale. Hour-to-Hour performance across an entire system or region can be far more informative.

The Annual or Quarterly Meeting
Annual meetings. You know how they work. The CEO gets on stage, updates are given, new strategies are discussed. These gatherings not only cost a fortune, but consume incredible amounts of creative and pragmatic energy.

A leader who has learned to move from command-and-control no longer needs to assert herself/himself in such a grand way every year. Instead, these leaders are secure in knowing that their vision is obvious, and their strategies have been communicated.

Strategic Partnerships
This one is a little tougher to swallow, I admit, but will become more significant over time.

Strategic Partnerships are all about opening the kimono to one specific partner in order to gain some mutual advantage. As organizations become more self-aware, then opening internal processes (whether that is a business process, or a software API), becomes natural and low-cost. In fact, it becomes far more expensive to guard these processes than it does to allow others to utilize them.

The Strategic Partnership is a Dead Paradigm because complimentary organizations have extremely low-cost and low-friction capabilities of finding eachother and interfacing based on open principals.

What Dead Paradigms have you seen in your organization? What old constraints have long been gone, but continue to influence the way things are done?

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google


3 Comments »

  Brent Ashley wrote @ October 17th, 2007 at 10:40 am

This paradigm’s not dead, it’s just pining for the fjords.

  Jeremy Thomas wrote @ October 17th, 2007 at 6:16 pm

Jevon,

You make an interesting observation about strategic partnerships. While I agree that Web 2.0 preaches openness and encourages companies to share data and business processes, I also think there is tremendous economic value to an organization in creating an alliance.

Illumio (the company Bill Ives profiled recently) has the banner “Google Enterprise Professional” on their website. This is a huge endorsement for illumio - i.e. Google thinks they’re cool enough to partner with. This endorsement brings credibility to their organization, and credibility will lead to more business.

For this reason I think strategic partnerships will stick around for a while.

  Paula Thornton wrote @ October 20th, 2007 at 2:05 pm

Dead Paradigms? How about security? It’s not that security needs to go away, it’s that we have to be smarter about the costs and the economics (tradeoffs). For example, over a decade ago MCI eliminated large contracts to huge volumes of data sources because of the security restrictions imposed. The restrictions would have effectively prevented us from using the data in ‘normal’ ways (tremendous reprogramming would have to have been done where the data was already being processed). We believed that the actions we had already taken would have been sufficient to secure the privacy concerns, but we were being dictated to as to specific actions we had to take to ‘use’ the data that we were paying large sums of money for.

The restrictions were unintelligently applied. The larger implications of the ‘rules’ were never considered.

Go look for any rule. As I make a point of in a 2.0 presentation: “Challenge ALL beliefs (at least once)”

As you point out Devon, there is tremendous untapped potential in these rules/assumptions.

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>