<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where is Internal IT Going?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:38:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/comment-page-1/#comment-139746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Husband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/#comment-139746</guid>
		<description>Dave Snowden was quite clear in his (our) podcast on knowledge work and the impact of w2.0 ... more and more the work will be done with platforms and apps from &quot;the cloud&quot; and centralized IT will become more and more an endangered species.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Snowden was quite clear in his (our) podcast on knowledge work and the impact of w2.0 &#8230; more and more the work will be done with platforms and apps from &#8220;the cloud&#8221; and centralized IT will become more and more an endangered species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ives</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/comment-page-1/#comment-139719</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/#comment-139719</guid>
		<description>Dan and Nitin - Thanks for your comments. I will look at Dan&#039;s suggestion. The smart CIOs will include facilitating the enterprise 2.0 bits in their firms as part of forward viewing management.  Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan and Nitin &#8211; Thanks for your comments. I will look at Dan&#8217;s suggestion. The smart CIOs will include facilitating the enterprise 2.0 bits in their firms as part of forward viewing management.  Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Keldsen</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/comment-page-1/#comment-139717</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Keldsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/#comment-139717</guid>
		<description>Commodity level (pipes, plumbing, infrastructure, guts - chose your metaphor) IT is fast evaporating into the outsourcing world (having just left an outsourcing company after 3+ years, it&#039;s actually more interesting than you might think), and most definitely, the smarter outsourcing outfits are looking for longer, relationship/partnership-oriented models, rather than one-off, small projects.

An article at CIO Insight was just sent to me by a colleague earlier today, which would be good reading as well, on this vein: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2248204,00.asp?kc=CIOMINUTE011608CIO1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CIOs, Meet Your New Boss&lt;/a&gt; - and hints at the &quot;grooming/social software&quot; post as well.

Short story: the boring bits of IT are being driven by commodity pricing and under the finger of the CFO, whereas &quot;innovation&quot; is being driven by a new breed (the evolutionary survivor of business IT) of CIO, that reports into strategy/forward-viewing management. That&#039;s the theory at least, but take a look at the article for the full details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commodity level (pipes, plumbing, infrastructure, guts &#8211; chose your metaphor) IT is fast evaporating into the outsourcing world (having just left an outsourcing company after 3+ years, it&#8217;s actually more interesting than you might think), and most definitely, the smarter outsourcing outfits are looking for longer, relationship/partnership-oriented models, rather than one-off, small projects.</p>
<p>An article at CIO Insight was just sent to me by a colleague earlier today, which would be good reading as well, on this vein: <a href="http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2248204,00.asp?kc=CIOMINUTE011608CIO1" rel="nofollow">CIOs, Meet Your New Boss</a> &#8211; and hints at the &#8220;grooming/social software&#8221; post as well.</p>
<p>Short story: the boring bits of IT are being driven by commodity pricing and under the finger of the CFO, whereas &#8220;innovation&#8221; is being driven by a new breed (the evolutionary survivor of business IT) of CIO, that reports into strategy/forward-viewing management. That&#8217;s the theory at least, but take a look at the article for the full details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NitinK</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/comment-page-1/#comment-139429</link>
		<dc:creator>NitinK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/01/14/where-is-internal-it-going/#comment-139429</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Bill! You&#039;ve raised some really interesting questions; as you say, these are logical extensions of this trend of providers becoming strategic partners of the Enterprise.

Although software is quite different from the automobile industry, I wonder if some of the same models could be used in this case - for example, the large OEMs, even while competing with each other, often include assemblies from the same supplier; their differentiation is at a higher level. Also, a very large percentage of any automobile comes from a hierarchical tier of suppliers, and the automakers manage to compete anyway.

In the same way, the IT department could evolve into a small set of generalist architects, who provide competitive advantage by *combining* the underlying software components (which in turn, are made up of even smaller components) into effective information systems and business processes.

This may be fanciful thinking - time will tell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Bill! You&#8217;ve raised some really interesting questions; as you say, these are logical extensions of this trend of providers becoming strategic partners of the Enterprise.</p>
<p>Although software is quite different from the automobile industry, I wonder if some of the same models could be used in this case &#8211; for example, the large OEMs, even while competing with each other, often include assemblies from the same supplier; their differentiation is at a higher level. Also, a very large percentage of any automobile comes from a hierarchical tier of suppliers, and the automakers manage to compete anyway.</p>
<p>In the same way, the IT department could evolve into a small set of generalist architects, who provide competitive advantage by *combining* the underlying software components (which in turn, are made up of even smaller components) into effective information systems and business processes.</p>
<p>This may be fanciful thinking &#8211; time will tell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
