<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Simple 2.0 gets painful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:38:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/comment-page-1/#comment-165554</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/#comment-165554</guid>
		<description>Oddly, this was the same theme of the conference the year before...and I couldn&#039;t get the analysts to understand what I was saying and why it was important: http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/09/20/crossing-the-chasm/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly, this was the same theme of the conference the year before&#8230;and I couldn&#8217;t get the analysts to understand what I was saying and why it was important: <a href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/09/20/crossing-the-chasm/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/09/20/crossing-the-chasm/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Radick</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/comment-page-1/#comment-151424</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Radick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/#comment-151424</guid>
		<description>Maggiefox brings up a great point about the cultural change.  What is the change management plan for Enterprise 2.0 implementation?  How are the needs and concerns of employees being met?  How are they being communicated?  What is the support system?  In my current position at Booz Allen Hamilton, we look at Social Media more as a cultural thing than a technical one.  

Social Media isn&#039;t about the software - it&#039;s more about the culture change that has to happen.  I&#039;ve seen wiki implementations where the organization created a process where everything that went on to the wiki had to be approved before it could be uploaded.  While the technology is technically doing its job in this example, I&#039;d argue that the organization didn&#039;t even implement Social Media; rather, they&#039;ve simply used a new tool to continue doing things in the same way they always have.  This is why successful implementation of Social Media depends on integrating technology, people, and processes from the very start.  All the Social Media technology in the world won&#039;t do any good if people aren&#039;t shown how to incorporate this technology into their work and understand that the same old processes don&#039;t work.  I hope that someday the major software developers will be cognizant of this fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggiefox brings up a great point about the cultural change.  What is the change management plan for Enterprise 2.0 implementation?  How are the needs and concerns of employees being met?  How are they being communicated?  What is the support system?  In my current position at Booz Allen Hamilton, we look at Social Media more as a cultural thing than a technical one.  </p>
<p>Social Media isn&#8217;t about the software &#8211; it&#8217;s more about the culture change that has to happen.  I&#8217;ve seen wiki implementations where the organization created a process where everything that went on to the wiki had to be approved before it could be uploaded.  While the technology is technically doing its job in this example, I&#8217;d argue that the organization didn&#8217;t even implement Social Media; rather, they&#8217;ve simply used a new tool to continue doing things in the same way they always have.  This is why successful implementation of Social Media depends on integrating technology, people, and processes from the very start.  All the Social Media technology in the world won&#8217;t do any good if people aren&#8217;t shown how to incorporate this technology into their work and understand that the same old processes don&#8217;t work.  I hope that someday the major software developers will be cognizant of this fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/comment-page-1/#comment-150696</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/#comment-150696</guid>
		<description>Or those smaller customers will gravitate towards solutions (wikis, hosted or otherwise, social bookmarking, whatever) that cost little or nothing and can be engaged with without the overhead of an IT department&#039;s involvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or those smaller customers will gravitate towards solutions (wikis, hosted or otherwise, social bookmarking, whatever) that cost little or nothing and can be engaged with without the overhead of an IT department&#8217;s involvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggiefox</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/comment-page-1/#comment-150540</link>
		<dc:creator>maggiefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/03/26/when-simple-20-gets-painful/#comment-150540</guid>
		<description>Great post, Jevon, and you raise just the first of many issues. Beyond implementation, what cultural change that can be expected within the organization, and how do vendors support/prepare the org for that? Internal marketing to get users to understand the value of adopting these new tools, support, training and communications plans go hand-in-hand with successful roll-outs (as AT&amp;T learned with their collaboration suites, a great case study).

Social media/enterprise 2.0/whatever you want to call it is a crazy and fascinating mashup of disciplines that traditionally don&#039;t come in one package and tend not to play all that well together - marcom and IT. We all have a lot of learning and exploring to do on our way to figuring out how it works best - whether the big guys will recognize that the rules/needs are different in time to leverage their size and relationships to dominate the market is the big question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Jevon, and you raise just the first of many issues. Beyond implementation, what cultural change that can be expected within the organization, and how do vendors support/prepare the org for that? Internal marketing to get users to understand the value of adopting these new tools, support, training and communications plans go hand-in-hand with successful roll-outs (as AT&amp;T learned with their collaboration suites, a great case study).</p>
<p>Social media/enterprise 2.0/whatever you want to call it is a crazy and fascinating mashup of disciplines that traditionally don&#8217;t come in one package and tend not to play all that well together &#8211; marcom and IT. We all have a lot of learning and exploring to do on our way to figuring out how it works best &#8211; whether the big guys will recognize that the rules/needs are different in time to leverage their size and relationships to dominate the market is the big question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
