<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowledge work and micro-processes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:38:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Karrer</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-178873</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Karrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-178873</guid>
		<description>Late to the game on this one.  It sparked a couple of thoughts.

In looking at performance of knowledge workers, while there is not really one-size-fits-all as in Taylor solutions, in many cases you can find improvements on a one-off basis.  However, as you point out, if what you are doing, is simply speeding the mess.

Still, I&#039;m not sure what the &quot;overall improvement strategy&quot; can be - especially when knowledge worker effectiveness and efficiency seems so personal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late to the game on this one.  It sparked a couple of thoughts.</p>
<p>In looking at performance of knowledge workers, while there is not really one-size-fits-all as in Taylor solutions, in many cases you can find improvements on a one-off basis.  However, as you point out, if what you are doing, is simply speeding the mess.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m not sure what the &#8220;overall improvement strategy&#8221; can be &#8211; especially when knowledge worker effectiveness and efficiency seems so personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-176917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-176917</guid>
		<description>Do you think life would be improved for knowledge workers if we made a more explicit distinction between practice and performance? I&#039;ve always thought that one of the unappreciated challenges of organizational work is that we are nearly always in performance mode; there&#039;s rarely time for anything resembling practice or rehearsal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think life would be improved for knowledge workers if we made a more explicit distinction between practice and performance? I&#8217;ve always thought that one of the unappreciated challenges of organizational work is that we are nearly always in performance mode; there&#8217;s rarely time for anything resembling practice or rehearsal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot  Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-176368</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot  Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-176368</guid>
		<description>IMHO

A musician, an artist, or an olympian do not practice or study the same way - but they all know what the output of their efforts should be.

The work that delivers that output is where the flexibility lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO</p>
<p>A musician, an artist, or an olympian do not practice or study the same way &#8211; but they all know what the output of their efforts should be.</p>
<p>The work that delivers that output is where the flexibility lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-175652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-175652</guid>
		<description>Paul - i think you are definitely on to something in the notion that knowledge workers need to manage their own processes. This will likely represent quite a shift in thinking for organizations and for knowledge workers themselves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &#8211; i think you are definitely on to something in the notion that knowledge workers need to manage their own processes. This will likely represent quite a shift in thinking for organizations and for knowledge workers themselves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-175642</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-175642</guid>
		<description>Super posting. I am going to reflect on this some more. There may be some serious implications for knowledge workers to &quot;manage their own processes&quot;, and indeed, the ability to build this capability .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super posting. I am going to reflect on this some more. There may be some serious implications for knowledge workers to &#8220;manage their own processes&#8221;, and indeed, the ability to build this capability .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-175404</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-175404</guid>
		<description>Jim, Loved the post!

I could not agree more, you can call it &quot;speeding up the mess&quot; or &quot;automating broken processes&quot; the result is the same.

In the context of Taylor though - we can get a start by looking less at the activity (or activities) in these processes (or micro processes) and look at the &quot;inputs&quot; and &quot;outputs&quot; that get to the desired result.

If we can successfully define these we get several benefits;

1) Areas where the process breaks down time-wise can be identified

2) Unneeded or wasted steps in the micro process can be identified.

Then (and only then, in my opinion) can it be identified if a technology solution (such as your Sharepoint example) can benefit in improving the processing speed of one or more of those inputs and outputs.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, Loved the post!</p>
<p>I could not agree more, you can call it &#8220;speeding up the mess&#8221; or &#8220;automating broken processes&#8221; the result is the same.</p>
<p>In the context of Taylor though &#8211; we can get a start by looking less at the activity (or activities) in these processes (or micro processes) and look at the &#8220;inputs&#8221; and &#8220;outputs&#8221; that get to the desired result.</p>
<p>If we can successfully define these we get several benefits;</p>
<p>1) Areas where the process breaks down time-wise can be identified</p>
<p>2) Unneeded or wasted steps in the micro process can be identified.</p>
<p>Then (and only then, in my opinion) can it be identified if a technology solution (such as your Sharepoint example) can benefit in improving the processing speed of one or more of those inputs and outputs.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
