<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowledge work and micro-processes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Karrer</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-178873</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Karrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-178873</guid>
		<description>Late to the game on this one.  It sparked a couple of thoughts.

In looking at performance of knowledge workers, while there is not really one-size-fits-all as in Taylor solutions, in many cases you can find improvements on a one-off basis.  However, as you point out, if what you are doing, is simply speeding the mess.

Still, I'm not sure what the "overall improvement strategy" can be - especially when knowledge worker effectiveness and efficiency seems so personal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late to the game on this one.  It sparked a couple of thoughts.</p>
<p>In looking at performance of knowledge workers, while there is not really one-size-fits-all as in Taylor solutions, in many cases you can find improvements on a one-off basis.  However, as you point out, if what you are doing, is simply speeding the mess.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m not sure what the &#8220;overall improvement strategy&#8221; can be - especially when knowledge worker effectiveness and efficiency seems so personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-176917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-176917</guid>
		<description>Do you think life would be improved for knowledge workers if we made a more explicit distinction between practice and performance? I've always thought that one of the unappreciated challenges of organizational work is that we are nearly always in performance mode; there's rarely time for anything resembling practice or rehearsal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think life would be improved for knowledge workers if we made a more explicit distinction between practice and performance? I&#8217;ve always thought that one of the unappreciated challenges of organizational work is that we are nearly always in performance mode; there&#8217;s rarely time for anything resembling practice or rehearsal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot  Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-176368</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot  Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-176368</guid>
		<description>IMHO

A musician, an artist, or an olympian do not practice or study the same way - but they all know what the output of their efforts should be.

The work that delivers that output is where the flexibility lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO</p>
<p>A musician, an artist, or an olympian do not practice or study the same way - but they all know what the output of their efforts should be.</p>
<p>The work that delivers that output is where the flexibility lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-175652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-175652</guid>
		<description>Paul - i think you are definitely on to something in the notion that knowledge workers need to manage their own processes. This will likely represent quite a shift in thinking for organizations and for knowledge workers themselves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul - i think you are definitely on to something in the notion that knowledge workers need to manage their own processes. This will likely represent quite a shift in thinking for organizations and for knowledge workers themselves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-175642</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-175642</guid>
		<description>Super posting. I am going to reflect on this some more. There may be some serious implications for knowledge workers to "manage their own processes", and indeed, the ability to build this capability .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super posting. I am going to reflect on this some more. There may be some serious implications for knowledge workers to &#8220;manage their own processes&#8221;, and indeed, the ability to build this capability .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/comment-page-1/#comment-175404</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/08/27/knowledge-work-and-micro-processes/#comment-175404</guid>
		<description>Jim, Loved the post!

I could not agree more, you can call it "speeding up the mess" or "automating broken processes" the result is the same.

In the context of Taylor though - we can get a start by looking less at the activity (or activities) in these processes (or micro processes) and look at the "inputs" and "outputs" that get to the desired result.

If we can successfully define these we get several benefits;

1) Areas where the process breaks down time-wise can be identified

2) Unneeded or wasted steps in the micro process can be identified.

Then (and only then, in my opinion) can it be identified if a technology solution (such as your Sharepoint example) can benefit in improving the processing speed of one or more of those inputs and outputs.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, Loved the post!</p>
<p>I could not agree more, you can call it &#8220;speeding up the mess&#8221; or &#8220;automating broken processes&#8221; the result is the same.</p>
<p>In the context of Taylor though - we can get a start by looking less at the activity (or activities) in these processes (or micro processes) and look at the &#8220;inputs&#8221; and &#8220;outputs&#8221; that get to the desired result.</p>
<p>If we can successfully define these we get several benefits;</p>
<p>1) Areas where the process breaks down time-wise can be identified</p>
<p>2) Unneeded or wasted steps in the micro process can be identified.</p>
<p>Then (and only then, in my opinion) can it be identified if a technology solution (such as your Sharepoint example) can benefit in improving the processing speed of one or more of those inputs and outputs.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
