<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 Vendors need to get more serious about mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/09/25/enteprise-20-vendors-need-to-get-more-serious-about-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/09/25/enteprise-20-vendors-need-to-get-more-serious-about-mobile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:29:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek DeMoro</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/09/25/enteprise-20-vendors-need-to-get-more-serious-about-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-185392</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek DeMoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=1141#comment-185392</guid>
		<description>I would definitely agree with you on this. At my company, we truly believe in enabling all users of the system to be able to participate via their client of choice. In doing so, it really means that the overall goal is to enable ANY mobile user the ability to fully participate with the application. Although it will include native support for the juggernauts such the Blackberry and the iPhone, we worked very hard to enable the ability to create and discuss ANY piece of content within the application, be it blogs, documents, discussion, images, videos/etc, all from something that every user has in common, email.

When users realize that they can rely on their mobile devices for creation and notifications, it opens up natural paths into their already current workflow. In other words, they dig it.

Cheers,
Derek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely agree with you on this. At my company, we truly believe in enabling all users of the system to be able to participate via their client of choice. In doing so, it really means that the overall goal is to enable ANY mobile user the ability to fully participate with the application. Although it will include native support for the juggernauts such the Blackberry and the iPhone, we worked very hard to enable the ability to create and discuss ANY piece of content within the application, be it blogs, documents, discussion, images, videos/etc, all from something that every user has in common, email.</p>
<p>When users realize that they can rely on their mobile devices for creation and notifications, it opens up natural paths into their already current workflow. In other words, they dig it.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Derek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/09/25/enteprise-20-vendors-need-to-get-more-serious-about-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-182721</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=1141#comment-182721</guid>
		<description>I am working on integrating Best Buy&#039;s internal social network, BlueShirt Nation, with Headmix to provide mobile functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on integrating Best Buy&#8217;s internal social network, BlueShirt Nation, with Headmix to provide mobile functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
