<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of the Twittersphere &#8211; Hubspot Reports &#8211; Stowe Boyd Retorts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/12/24/state-of-the-twittersphere-hubspot-reports-stowe-boyd-retorts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/12/24/state-of-the-twittersphere-hubspot-reports-stowe-boyd-retorts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:28:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/12/24/state-of-the-twittersphere-hubspot-reports-stowe-boyd-retorts/comment-page-1/#comment-203915</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=1239#comment-203915</guid>
		<description>I did also find this utility to leverage Twitter search in a slightly different way to do topical searches and find interesting people to follow: http://twitority.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did also find this utility to leverage Twitter search in a slightly different way to do topical searches and find interesting people to follow: <a href="http://twitority.com/" rel="nofollow">http://twitority.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/12/24/state-of-the-twittersphere-hubspot-reports-stowe-boyd-retorts/comment-page-1/#comment-203903</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=1239#comment-203903</guid>
		<description>I was just reflecting today how my &#039;follows&#039; have evolved over time. With almost 500 in my list, I&#039;m also surprised that at times there is very little flow -- or little meaningful flow. I&#039;ve developed specific criteria for my follows, but also have some exceptions. Since my answers don&#039;t necessarily correlate to your notes, I&#039;ll avoid numbers and use letters:

A. I review everyone that follows me -- there are a lot of spammers that need to be blocked (and surprisingly some of them are not that obvious any more).

B. I read one or more pages of an individual&#039;s recent tweets to see if what they have to say is of value. When I&#039;m not sure, I follow for a while and watch their flow. If the individual isn&#039;t sharing their thoughts, findings and discoveries, they typically get unfollowed.

C. I&#039;d checked out Tim O&#039;Reilly some time ago -- he wasn&#039;t using Twitter like he is now. I didn&#039;t follow him until I read he&#039;d finally &#039;figured it out&#039;.

D. Oddly, people you know are not necessarily the people you want to follow on Twitter. It depends on your own use of Twitter. For me, a lot of the people I know aren&#039;t focused on the same deep topics I&#039;m interested in.

E. You may get to know people on Twitter better than people you night work with in person, who often don&#039;t share as much, or engage in deep conversations (depends on your own dynamics in either case).

F. I&#039;ve discovered that Twitter requires an &#039;immersive&#039; experience -- no one can tell you about it enough for it to make sense, you have to experience it to find the value, and a single experience is often not enough. A good number of people report that they were either &#039;hand held&#039; through the process, experienced it as a result of a conference, or were so shamed into it by others that they kept at it until it made sense.

G. Twitter is a wealth of information for me. Yesterday I watched a newly-posted TED presentation, that talked about how our choices change based on comparisons. I recently found some great sources of information. In comparison some of my existing follows started looking less meaningful -- I pruned my list.

H. I&#039;ve not found any of the &#039;recommendation&#039; engines to be useful (indeed many of them offer people I&#039;d never consider following). While I still had to do a lot of filtering myself, I did find a lot of meaningful people to follow last week by doing a Twitter search on &quot;Shirky&quot;. Searching on a relevant topic of interest surfaces people talking about same.

I. There&#039;s an acquired form engaging in real debate (an art form). While I am still a student of the craft, I am often very firm in my statements. I do this to take a stand and to engage in a dialog of discovery. I&#039;m surprised to find that there are a lot of people who can&#039;t engage in such exchanges or can&#039;t approach the conversation in the spirit of discovery. This is unfortunate.

In general, there is a wide-open opportunity for automated methods to assist in both finding AND managing follow lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just reflecting today how my &#8216;follows&#8217; have evolved over time. With almost 500 in my list, I&#8217;m also surprised that at times there is very little flow &#8212; or little meaningful flow. I&#8217;ve developed specific criteria for my follows, but also have some exceptions. Since my answers don&#8217;t necessarily correlate to your notes, I&#8217;ll avoid numbers and use letters:</p>
<p>A. I review everyone that follows me &#8212; there are a lot of spammers that need to be blocked (and surprisingly some of them are not that obvious any more).</p>
<p>B. I read one or more pages of an individual&#8217;s recent tweets to see if what they have to say is of value. When I&#8217;m not sure, I follow for a while and watch their flow. If the individual isn&#8217;t sharing their thoughts, findings and discoveries, they typically get unfollowed.</p>
<p>C. I&#8217;d checked out Tim O&#8217;Reilly some time ago &#8212; he wasn&#8217;t using Twitter like he is now. I didn&#8217;t follow him until I read he&#8217;d finally &#8216;figured it out&#8217;.</p>
<p>D. Oddly, people you know are not necessarily the people you want to follow on Twitter. It depends on your own use of Twitter. For me, a lot of the people I know aren&#8217;t focused on the same deep topics I&#8217;m interested in.</p>
<p>E. You may get to know people on Twitter better than people you night work with in person, who often don&#8217;t share as much, or engage in deep conversations (depends on your own dynamics in either case).</p>
<p>F. I&#8217;ve discovered that Twitter requires an &#8216;immersive&#8217; experience &#8212; no one can tell you about it enough for it to make sense, you have to experience it to find the value, and a single experience is often not enough. A good number of people report that they were either &#8216;hand held&#8217; through the process, experienced it as a result of a conference, or were so shamed into it by others that they kept at it until it made sense.</p>
<p>G. Twitter is a wealth of information for me. Yesterday I watched a newly-posted TED presentation, that talked about how our choices change based on comparisons. I recently found some great sources of information. In comparison some of my existing follows started looking less meaningful &#8212; I pruned my list.</p>
<p>H. I&#8217;ve not found any of the &#8216;recommendation&#8217; engines to be useful (indeed many of them offer people I&#8217;d never consider following). While I still had to do a lot of filtering myself, I did find a lot of meaningful people to follow last week by doing a Twitter search on &#8220;Shirky&#8221;. Searching on a relevant topic of interest surfaces people talking about same.</p>
<p>I. There&#8217;s an acquired form engaging in real debate (an art form). While I am still a student of the craft, I am often very firm in my statements. I do this to take a stand and to engage in a dialog of discovery. I&#8217;m surprised to find that there are a lot of people who can&#8217;t engage in such exchanges or can&#8217;t approach the conversation in the spirit of discovery. This is unfortunate.</p>
<p>In general, there is a wide-open opportunity for automated methods to assist in both finding AND managing follow lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

