<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why [fill-in-the-blank] Fails?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:28:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-254211</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=3990#comment-254211</guid>
		<description>Andy: Don&#039;t let me burst your bubble (especially since someone has now invested in a very expensive paperweight). iRise is the antithesis of 2.0. It&#039;s a 400pound sledgehammer for putting nails in the wall.

This is where there&#039;s good design, and then there&#039;s meaningful design. iRise is an enterprise-class tool where enterprise-class is not relevant. Another measure of it&#039;s applicability or qualification as 2.0-relevant is what I call the Google-training-metric. How much training do you need for Google-search? iRise takes a week. That&#039;s just to learn the tool -- then you need to figure out what standards you want to apply for your own environment so that they&#039;re repeatable and you&#039;re not reinventing everything from scratch with each project.

No -- iRise is not relevant here. While I absolutely respect them for what they have done, and I&#039;m typically keen on enterprise plans, the only time iRise would make sense is if you were automating an entire enterprise -- ALL of it -- that&#039;s writing your own version of SAP and the like -- then it would be worth the investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy: Don&#8217;t let me burst your bubble (especially since someone has now invested in a very expensive paperweight). iRise is the antithesis of 2.0. It&#8217;s a 400pound sledgehammer for putting nails in the wall.</p>
<p>This is where there&#8217;s good design, and then there&#8217;s meaningful design. iRise is an enterprise-class tool where enterprise-class is not relevant. Another measure of it&#8217;s applicability or qualification as 2.0-relevant is what I call the Google-training-metric. How much training do you need for Google-search? iRise takes a week. That&#8217;s just to learn the tool &#8212; then you need to figure out what standards you want to apply for your own environment so that they&#8217;re repeatable and you&#8217;re not reinventing everything from scratch with each project.</p>
<p>No &#8212; iRise is not relevant here. While I absolutely respect them for what they have done, and I&#8217;m typically keen on enterprise plans, the only time iRise would make sense is if you were automating an entire enterprise &#8212; ALL of it &#8212; that&#8217;s writing your own version of SAP and the like &#8212; then it would be worth the investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-254133</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=3990#comment-254133</guid>
		<description>Excellent article!  My company, Capgemini just standardized on iRise (http://www.irise.com/), which I think is part of the point of your article.  I haven&#039;t used it yet, but it *looks* very powerful.

Thanks,
Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article!  My company, Capgemini just standardized on iRise (<a href="http://www.irise.com/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.irise.com/)</a>, which I think is part of the point of your article.  I haven&#8217;t used it yet, but it *looks* very powerful.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-253873</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=3990#comment-253873</guid>
		<description>Esteban: I&#039;m having another movie moment. I&#039;m in Hook during the &quot;I believe in fairies&quot; scene. It&#039;s as if (as I&#039;ve done in immersive reframing sessions some teams have given me the privilege to share with them) people need permission to BE their true selves -- to unleash their own passions at work.

Let&#039;s simply start there: I hereby give you all permission (by the wave of my fairy wand) to bring your whole selves to work and to find ways to tap your own individual passions via your daily work.

Try it. Will it be easy? Is exercising easy? This is you, exercising your total, tremendous potential.

Let me know how your experiment goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esteban: I&#8217;m having another movie moment. I&#8217;m in Hook during the &#8220;I believe in fairies&#8221; scene. It&#8217;s as if (as I&#8217;ve done in immersive reframing sessions some teams have given me the privilege to share with them) people need permission to BE their true selves &#8212; to unleash their own passions at work.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s simply start there: I hereby give you all permission (by the wave of my fairy wand) to bring your whole selves to work and to find ways to tap your own individual passions via your daily work.</p>
<p>Try it. Will it be easy? Is exercising easy? This is you, exercising your total, tremendous potential.</p>
<p>Let me know how your experiment goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Kolsky</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-253814</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Kolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=3990#comment-253814</guid>
		<description>Oooh!

First, amazing write-up.  Truly one-of-a-kind.  Examining thing from a different perspective is always a very interesting model to follow when looking for better solutions (what we call post-mortem in corporate-speak - right?)

In the spirit of looking for a different POV -- how about taking a different approach.  I am quite certain, because I know a lot of them and read some other interviews, that if you approach any person in that team and ask them why they do what they do you will get a look as if you just asked them whether you can date their mother.  Then, they will sit you down and explain to you that it is not a job, it is a passion - a lifestyle.  They chose to do this because sitting in a room for 6 hours drawing fishies with pen and paper (or a computer in 3D) is what they want to do, who they are, and what they hope to do until they moment they die -- and they will die with a smile.

Now, and here is the interesting perspective, find that person in an  implementation project.

That is why that works, and why ours don&#039;t.  Passion projects mean you commit to doing it, you don&#039;t look to see whether there is a review-time approaching and you have to justify your position, or whether you can do a little bit less and still get away with it and spend the weekend away from the office, or similar behaviors.  True, we may never find that person in our projects -- but without them the model you describe is, IMO, not possible.

Just sayin&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh!</p>
<p>First, amazing write-up.  Truly one-of-a-kind.  Examining thing from a different perspective is always a very interesting model to follow when looking for better solutions (what we call post-mortem in corporate-speak &#8211; right?)</p>
<p>In the spirit of looking for a different POV &#8212; how about taking a different approach.  I am quite certain, because I know a lot of them and read some other interviews, that if you approach any person in that team and ask them why they do what they do you will get a look as if you just asked them whether you can date their mother.  Then, they will sit you down and explain to you that it is not a job, it is a passion &#8211; a lifestyle.  They chose to do this because sitting in a room for 6 hours drawing fishies with pen and paper (or a computer in 3D) is what they want to do, who they are, and what they hope to do until they moment they die &#8212; and they will die with a smile.</p>
<p>Now, and here is the interesting perspective, find that person in an  implementation project.</p>
<p>That is why that works, and why ours don&#8217;t.  Passion projects mean you commit to doing it, you don&#8217;t look to see whether there is a review-time approaching and you have to justify your position, or whether you can do a little bit less and still get away with it and spend the weekend away from the office, or similar behaviors.  True, we may never find that person in our projects &#8212; but without them the model you describe is, IMO, not possible.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-253718</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=3990#comment-253718</guid>
		<description>Chris: Thanks for the pointer. I only sat down to write this because I was organizing DVDs so now I know exactly where Ratatouille is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: Thanks for the pointer. I only sat down to write this because I was organizing DVDs so now I know exactly where Ratatouille is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Yeh</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-253691</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Yeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=3990#comment-253691</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post, Paula.  I think you&#039;d also enjoy the Brad Bird/Thomas Keller special feature on the Ratatouille DVD--awesome stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post, Paula.  I think you&#8217;d also enjoy the Brad Bird/Thomas Keller special feature on the Ratatouille DVD&#8211;awesome stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/11/09/why-fill-in-the-blank-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-253549</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=3990#comment-253549</guid>
		<description>Terrific post, Paula, and thanks for making it relevant to readers and for making us reflect on this approach. A friend of mine took me on a tour of Pixar&#039;s research for Cars and it was very similar. They had traveled Route 66 and picked up various samples (dirt, souveniers, photos, etc.) to capture that believability. You&#039;re right; thank you Pixar!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific post, Paula, and thanks for making it relevant to readers and for making us reflect on this approach. A friend of mine took me on a tour of Pixar&#8217;s research for Cars and it was very similar. They had traveled Route 66 and picked up various samples (dirt, souveniers, photos, etc.) to capture that believability. You&#8217;re right; thank you Pixar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

