by Rob Paterson
April 6, 2010 at 8:03 am
· Filed under 2.0 Business Model, Chaord, Organizational Design, Relationships, Social Networking, Trust, Trusted Space
What is value? Usually it is something that is scarce. What is scarce today? Certainly not content which is why all the attempts to make content pay are doomed. Content has never been more plentiful. In fact we are approaching the point where content is all but infinite.
The Value point then becomes finding content that means some thing to each of us. So Search is a Holy Grail here. And it is very valuable. But can we rely only on algorithms? I do not think so.
This week two people that I respect and trust a lot Craig Newmark and Jeremiah Owyang have put their own stakes in the ground saying that ironically it will be a screen of named people in our social orbit that will be the final layer of screening for meaning. That our impersonal transactional world will return to a personal world where reputation is key. There is enough convergence to call it now I think.
What you are about to see is how the world will be organized in the future. It’s official now!
This is the new Org Chart.

The Inner Circle is your Trusted Space – moving out from this is a gradient of Trust and Intimacy – These rings have numeric boundaries. The Inner Circle is limited to 8. The next ring for you is 34. The outer ring is of course 144. If you look up to the diagram above the “Donut”, you will see the Fibonacci Curve. There you will see that these numbers are the boundaries of the curve – this is how nature organizes all complex systems. The Dunbar number is 144. (Not 150 by the way) We know that 8 is the ideal team size. We know that 34 is the ideal large team.
To the left I have added the “Permaflower” – this is the organizing model for Permaculture. I think that this may be the model that we use to organize the Natural Organization.
Here is how Craig opens his piece:
People use social networking tools to figure out who they can trust and rely on for decision making. By the end of this decade, power and influence will shift largely to those people with the best reputations and trust networks, from people with money and nominal power. That is, peer networks will confer legitimacy on people emerging from the grassroots.
This shift is already happening, gradually creating a new power and influence equilibrium with new checks and balances. It will seem dramatic when its tipping point occurs, even though we’re living through it now.
Everyone gets a chance to participate in large or small ways, giving a voice to what we once called “the silent majority.”
Here is how Jeremiah describes it:

Here is how a Permagarden is layed out:

Here we see the idea of a gradient in the hierarchy more clearly. Inside the network are of course sub networks. In Permagardening, these are called Guilds. They are reinforcing groups of diverse species. Toby Hemenway is the source of these lovely garden images.

Talking about guilds here is how Chris Allen has shown us how Guilds form in WOW.

In this slide you can also see the leverage that the Fibonacci Sequence can give you. Imagine your 8 inside the Trusted Space. Imagine that you have 4 good friends in the next circle who have 4 friends who have 4 friends and then 4 more – that is 4,096 people. A group of 34 with 4 friends gets you 1.3 million. 144 gets you 429 million.
A small group can have huge social leverage. Enough I think to so anything.
Permalink
20 Tweets
 |
MikeApril 8th, 2010 at 3:00 am |
Its interesting to see the use of the Fibonacci sequence (its the same as the golden section right?), but at the same time to assume that each 4 friends of each person have the same influence on each other if any is quite assumptive and whilst theoretically possible I would say that a friend of a friend of a friend is unlikely to have heard of friend “A”.
 |
ffblogApril 6th, 2010 at 8:03 am |
New: : Filtering the meaning from the infinite web http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2010/04/06/filtering-the-meaning-from-the-infinite-web/
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
 |
SEOSpyApril 6th, 2010 at 8:03 am |
RT @ffblog: Filtering the meaning from the infinite web http://bit.ly/dhaS61
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Filtering the meaning from the infinite web http://bit.ly/bHp9dK
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Filtering the meaning from the infinite web http://bit.ly/bQ31ZV
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
fast forward.. Filtering the meaning from the infinite web – What is value? Usually it is something that is scarce…. http://ow.ly/16ZXE5
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Brill piece on where value lies in a world where content is plentiful “Filtering the meaning from the infinite web” http://is.gd/bi7da
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Filtering the meaning from the infinite web http://ow.ly/1wai9 Somewhat academic but thought provoking. #socialmedia #e20 #collaboration
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Filtering the meaning from the infinite web http://bit.ly/c71p2W great read from @robpatrob
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Excellent RT @darwineco Filtering the meaning from the infinite web http://bit.ly/c71p2W great read from @robpatrob
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
 |
johntApril 11th, 2010 at 4:09 am |
Filtering the meaning from the infinite web > finding, refining, discussing, contextualising via social network http://icio.us/3r355v
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
RT @johnt: Filtering the meaning from the infinite web > finding, refining, discussing, contextualising via social network http://ici …
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
 |
byAgahApril 11th, 2010 at 6:46 am |
Filtering the meaning from the infinite web http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2010/04/06/filtering-the-meaning-from-the-infinite-web/
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Rob Patterson on: Finding, refining, discussing, contextualising [meaning] via social network http://icio.us/3r355v /via @johnt +++ #km #e20
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Rob Patterson on: Finding, refining, discussing, contextualising [meaning] via social network http://icio.us/3r355v /via @johnt +++ #km #e20
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
 |
gagan_sApril 11th, 2010 at 10:57 am |
.@roundtrip @johnt: Soc n/w http://icio.us/3r355v
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2010/04/06/filtering-the-meaning-from-the-infinite-web/
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Interesting article: fltering the meaning from the infinite web: the new Org Chart. http://bit.ly/dgc3H6
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
Filtering the meaning from infinite web http://bit.ly/97yKqk via @k1v1n I ‘d add: cirles of influence are dynamic-based on context/content
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
RT @aafromaa: Filtering the meaning from infinite web http://bit.ly/97yKqk via @k1v1n I ‘d add: cirles of influence are dynamic-based …
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
The FASTForward Blog»Filtering the meaning from the infinite web: Enterprise 2.0 Blog: News, Coverage, and Commentary: http://bit.ly/a3z3mn
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
» Subscribe to the RSS feed for these comments
HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Additional comments powered by BackType