<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personal and Company Digital Spying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2010/06/07/personal-and-company-digital-spying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2010/06/07/personal-and-company-digital-spying/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:28:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam D</title>
		<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2010/06/07/personal-and-company-digital-spying/comment-page-1/#comment-296424</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/?p=4853#comment-296424</guid>
		<description>To reply to your closing questions, I think it might be an ease-of-access temptation. I&#039;m curious as to how many of the study thought that spying through tech was too much of a violation of trust to commit. (That is, snooping on unfounded suspicion is something that I wouldn&#039;t do to my girlfriend. If I suspected her, it&#039;s vastly more justified.) Who of that 10% under 25 suspected their significant other, or found out simply by browsing their texts?

In the enterprise, I feel that similar discretion should be used. Trust your employees, but if there are lapses in judgment or commitment, take a look. If they&#039;re using their work time to converse, or to job search (!), you the organization would (IMO) have the right to attempt to find out.

Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To reply to your closing questions, I think it might be an ease-of-access temptation. I&#8217;m curious as to how many of the study thought that spying through tech was too much of a violation of trust to commit. (That is, snooping on unfounded suspicion is something that I wouldn&#8217;t do to my girlfriend. If I suspected her, it&#8217;s vastly more justified.) Who of that 10% under 25 suspected their significant other, or found out simply by browsing their texts?</p>
<p>In the enterprise, I feel that similar discretion should be used. Trust your employees, but if there are lapses in judgment or commitment, take a look. If they&#8217;re using their work time to converse, or to job search (!), you the organization would (IMO) have the right to attempt to find out.</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

