inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Remember Portals? How Can You Forget?

by Bill Ives

Remember portals? I have heard about a number of cases where enterprise 2.0 collaboration systems have replaced portals. One firm even replaced their portal with Facebook and got a lot of PR for it. Is this a trend? I do not mean the Facbook part, just the E20 part.

Perhaps but a recent Forrester report, Portal Servers Refuse To Go Quietly, by Tim Waters found that portals are still popular in many circles. As the report summary cited, “portal server technologies continue to be widely deployed by enterprises. Although leading vendors are evolving portal servers into broad content and collaboration platforms, the core portal services — aggregation “on the glass” and user authorization for access control and personalization — remain the leading use cases. Newer alternatives, including open source platforms and mashups, are gaining ground.”

So portals may remain popular but they need to look over their c shoulders as the report also recommended that, “knowledge management teams should carefully evaluate their needs to determine if a portal server layer is appropriate.”

Drawing for a survey taken in North America and Europe, Q4 2009, they found that 20% of the firms surveyed planned to expand or upgrade existing portal server implementations, 26% had already implemented and were not expanding while 15% planned to implement over the next year or longer.

There were some concerns. Many users suffered from the complexity and the extensive customization effort. I have seen many of these drawn out portal implementations first hand.  They can be the darling of the solutions integrators looking for big time projects with ever expanding budgets.  The report offers a number of instances of similar outcomes. It also said that the majority of the users they interviewed were surprised by the amount of customization required.  I am not surprised at this finding as I have rarely seen a portal project come in on budget or time.

Downsized budgets can be an obstacle for new portal efforts.  The report found that many firms indicated that the move toward Lean and Agile development practices has encouraged them to reevaluate the rule of heavy handed portal servers. The report encourages knowledge management and IT people to be aware of the other options available.

Share and Enjoy:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt


9 Tweets 2 Other Comments

12 Comments »

Larry HawesJuly 1st, 2010 at 2:35 pm

It is interesting to note that the “home” pages of most existing E2.0 software suites strongly resemble portals. E2.0 suites aggregate information from various sources into a single interface populated by various widgets, just like portals. However, E2.0 suites have not been able to supply the same level of profile-driven information personalization that portals provide.

Perhaps the most glaring example is the activity stream that has become the visual and functional centerpiece of most E2.0 suites. Users must manually filter the stream to isolate updates from specific individuals, groups, applications, etc. If the activity stream were embedded in a portal, the personalization technology in the portal framework could automatically filter the stream for the individual, based on current work context.

So until E2.0 suites offer better personalization functionality, portals infused with collaboration functionality may offer a better alternative for knowledge workers drowning in information.

emcconne_readsJune 30th, 2010 at 3:47 am

Remember Portals? How Can You Forget?: Remember portals? I have heard about a number of cases where enterpri… http://tinyurl.com/3293uef

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

roland fiegeJune 30th, 2010 at 4:08 am

"Sozialen Medien fehlt bislang die Komplexität" – das sehen viele Nutzer (Informationsüberflutung) und Firmen (kommen mit der Innovationsgeschwindigkeit im Netz nicht mehr nach) anders. my2ct

This comment was originally posted on Banedon’s Cyber-Junk

Thorsten ZoernerJune 30th, 2010 at 4:10 am

Die Komplexität in der Technologie fehlt – was in den Verfahren/Einsatzmöglichkeiten die Komplexität erhöht.
Baue etwas einfach => Du Anwender machen es kompliziert.
Baue etwas kompliziert => Die Anwender machen es einfach.

This comment was originally posted on Banedon’s Cyber-Junk

hebsgaardJune 30th, 2010 at 6:06 am

Remember Portals? How Can You Forget? #e20 @gov20 via @billives http://bit.ly/cl0qhq

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

ChrisManet22June 30th, 2010 at 7:35 am

fast forward.. Remember Portals? How Can You Forget? – Remember portals? I have heard about a number of cases where … http://ow.ly/17WuCa

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

cgerrishJune 30th, 2010 at 12:14 pm

Remember Portals? How Can You Forget? http://ff.im/-mXV4L

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

BillIvesJune 30th, 2010 at 1:11 pm

post on Remember Portals? How Can You Forget? http://bit.ly/d76H8u

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

jdspyersJune 30th, 2010 at 1:20 pm

Remember Portals? How Can You Forget? http://bit.ly/cl0qhq

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

thejennyliJune 30th, 2010 at 1:36 pm

Haha, believe we’re still working building portals at SF. Aiyaiyai.RT@jdspyers: Remember Portals? How Can You Forget? http://bit.ly/cl0qhq

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

sutrosoftwareJuly 1st, 2010 at 3:34 pm

RT @BillIves: post on Remember Portals? How Can You Forget? http://bit.ly/d76H8u

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

masscustomizeitJuly 9th, 2010 at 8:58 pm

The FASTForward Blog » Remember Portals? How Can You Forget …: jonhusband: RT @aponcier: Social Computing in … http://bit.ly/aHKNhn #MC

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

» Subscribe to the RSS feed for these comments

Your comment

Want an image to appear near your comment? Go to gravatar.com

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Additional comments powered by BackType