by Jerry Michalski
February 21, 2008 at 6:18 pm · Filed under
FASTForward '08, FASTforward08, Fast, Search
Jerry asks John how it feels to see his small Norwegian company grow into a global company — and what the Microsoft deal means.
Bio: John Markus Lervik, Ph.D., is CEO and a co-founder of FAST. Dr. Lervik earlier served as the company’s CTO, and holds a Ph.D. from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

John Markus Lervik:
Play Now |
Play in Popup |
Download (299)
by Jerry Michalski
February 21, 2008 at 4:26 pm · Filed under
FASTForward '08, Fast, Financial services
Brooks talks with Jerry about the new strategic importance of search for financial services companies in creating a consistent customer experience across multiple touchpoints.
Brooks Gibbins has worldwide responsibility for the securities, retail banking, insurance and financial information sectors at FAST. He has over 12 years of experience in enterprise software and hosted solutions in the financial services market. Prior to joining FAST, he was a key executive with Multex.com, a financial information and global research portals company. He oversaw the build out of the European business, co-led global sales, and headed up the firm’s investment management solutions business. He began his career with Price Waterhouse in their SAP technology consulting practice.
by Jerry Michalski
February 20, 2008 at 9:45 am · Filed under
Enterprise 2.0, FASTForward '08, FASTforward08, Fast
Bjorn discusses the demands of integrating the back end. He focuses on how to determining what needs to work and when.
Bio: Bjørn Olstad, Ph.D., serves as the Chief Technology Officer. Before joining FAST, Dr. Olstad held key positions within General Electric Medical Systems, including Director of Research and Development for Cardiac Ultrasound. He has served as a professor in computer science at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), where he was awarded the youngest professorship ever.

Bjorn Olstad Jerry Michalski:
Play Now |
Play in Popup |
Download (580)
by Rob Paterson
February 19, 2008 at 3:42 pm · Filed under
FASTForward '08, Fast, Search
I will leave Fast 08 knowing one thing. That Search will be one of the key ingredients in the new business model.
Imagine if I sent you a container full of DVDs. Packed to the top with DVD’s. Many of them great films and shows but many of them not. Imagine there are 50 million of them in the container. Would this be helpful for you? In your busy day, how much time would you invest in trying to find the gems? With so many unknown to you, would you bother to have a look to see if you would like them?
My bet is that you would give up after a while. And so all that content would in effect have little value - even though it may have cost a lot to make.
Now now metaphor. Imagine the web in say 3 years time. Now for every conventional film, there are a million made by us the public - some of which are very good. There are more films in 2010 than have ever been made before. Now every film made will be there. (If film bores you, think books, or music, or shirts, or shoes) Think of a store the size of America - with no order to the layout or shelving) Will you have time to sort through all of this? I doubt it.
So of course when and should you find something that you like it will have value. In this new world of personal film, there will be thousands of films that you have never heard of that you might like. But the barriers to finding it are very high.
So I am now convinced that in a world of infinite information, finding what I like and what I would like will become one of the most valuable processes. Search becomes not a nice tool but essential. I even use it myself now to find my own stuff. I can’t possibly keep up even with my own output let alone yours!
True search will not look like Google search box. I will want to know stuff that is important for me as a matter of course. I want events and stuff that will affect me to arrive before my eyes. I will want to be able to find stuff I don’t even know I need.
My bet is that my friends will play a role in this. Even today, I would rather, in my time starved life, accept the recommendation of a friend than a stranger. He knows me and is filtering better.
For time and attention are scarce for all of us.
So as I struggle to understand all I have heard today - I know this. That the web has made the world infinitely more complex. There are too many choices out there for me to comprehend.
Evolved search will give me a perspective that will enable me to make meaning of it. Evolved Search will be like my own nervous system on the web. It will be an extension of me. It will filter as much as find.
Our nervous system deliberately limits noise. The world and life offer us too much data. So our eyesight is confined to a narrow bandwidth. Our hearing can be selective - enabling most of us to hear what others say in a crowd. We have evolved to select out the important from the noise. So it will be with Search - it too will have to constrain but also allow - allow what is most meaningful for each of us.
by Rob Paterson
January 8, 2008 at 9:47 am · Filed under
David Weinberger, Fast, Microsoft, Search, Social Media, TV, Video, Wisdom of Crowds
Why is Microsoft buying Fast and why should we care?
David Weinberger will be speaking at the Fast Forward conference in Feb. I mention this in the context of his helpful thoughts about how the world is going to be “organized” when there is so much content available.
The world no longer has to be organized in a hierarchy. It can be found instead.
It appears that Micorsoft sees the value in enabling people within enterprises to discover the “Wisdom of Crowds”. No longer does the Enterprise have to Organize its information in an ever more cumbersome and complex hierarchy. What Microsoft hope they can offer the user is easy access to anyhting inside the organization - just as Google is allowing us such access outside. With this approach to search, the full power of the enterprise knowledge can be accessed relatively easily. This might actually start to change things?
This leads me to another point about Media, TV and Radio.
TV and radio Content is today largely organized as a library or worse. Much of the content is simply a set of lists or even worse a set of Banker’s Boxes with stuff in it that you have to rummage through to find. Look around station or Producers sites - I wont embarrasss them by linking. You will see a catalog or worse a long, long list of stuff with no way of finding it or finding out whether the content is worth looking at.
My sister lost a 4 carat diamond a few years ago while cleaning out the horses in her barn. The diamond remains latently valuable but only if a person was to find it. That is what it is like for most stations and producers. If you have diamonds, they are in the shit somewhere and no one knows how big they are. PS her old farm is in new Jersey.
So many in TV and Radio have not got one of the key value issues in the new media. If I cannot find it easily and if I cannot evaluate whether I should use my precious time, no matter how good the content is - it has little or no value.
Organizing content to be found and to be evaluated will be a critical source of value in the new media when content will approach the infinite.
More later